I never thought
that history could be taught this way! I can still remember how we used to bury
our heads in history textbooks memorizing who did what in which year. This was
how we studied history. To be honest, I don't remember much about the textbooks
now.
Mission US is a
game, but it is much more serious than any textbooks about history that I have
ever read. The reason is that it is not about bulky books trying to cram
students with facts but about stories that would happen to an ordinary person
in a certain historical and cultural context. It is truly amazing!
I played the game
twice, each time for an hour. I tried two missions, one in the context of 1770
and one in 1848. Through two animated teenagers’ roles, I got to live their lives
in history, talked to different people, learned about the world back then and
relived the key moments in history. Each role is set in a different identity in
a different era in history. Players would play as these teenagers, experience
their lives, finish their tasks and more importantly, learn about society in
history during the process.
(see how the roles are culturally diversified!)
To me, the game is
more meaningful in cultural education than linguistic education. To be honest, I
myself have many words that I have no clues what the meanings are in a certain history
context. So I would be concerned that the words in the games are extremely demanding
to L2 learners, maybe except for college students who major in English language
and literature. If asked to learn every detail of the stories, hidden
historical facts and social status, students would lose the interests due to the
totally demanding culture-embedded texts. However, it doesn't mean we can’t use
it in language teaching.
I would use it as
an extensive cultural class. Here are what my objectives would be:
1. For each
mission, students should be able to summarize the main social classes and conflicts
in the historical contexts, different parties and their different interests.
2. For each
mission, students should be able to identify the key features of the specific era
in American history and why it is so important in history.
3. For each
mission, students should be able to understand at least 10 new words that are embedded
with cultural meanings.
4. For each
mission, students should be able to identify reasons for why choosing some
answers over others to at least 5 interactions with different roles.
How to assess if
students have achieved these goals?
For objectives 1
and 2, I would have students write short essays to respond to a series of
prompts I have designed for them, mainly on historical significance and social
conflicts in a certain period. For objective 3 and 4, I would pick up some
conversations from the plot and go through them with students. During the
process, I can access them orally. Since the contents are mostly about
conversations, the dialogic communication of the game is quite helpful.
However, the communication is achieved by oral expressions from the roles in the
game and the multiple choice questions for the students. I would have students
to perform the conversations in real life, so that they can also produce
outputs, and meanwhile, I could assess whether they have made the right choices
and what their understandings are towards the different choices.
Language
performance indicators: ESL.C.9-12.5.1.2
Students
demonstrate an understanding of a broad range of US cultural and political
referents through institutions, functions and processes at the local and national
levels, and compare/contrast these with parallels in the student’ native
community.
The assessments you designed for objectives #1 and 2 work well. However, they don't really fit under ESL.C.9-12.5.12 because there is no comparison with the student's native community. The other assessments you mention seem to be good learning activities as opposed to assessments. If you teach the vocabulary, then you could test it in a simple matching or multiple choice test. As far as performing the conversations in real life, that sounds like the first step in another good class activity. After which the students could discuss why they made certain choices.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for clearing up things for me, Dr. Burgos! I have also read your email and notes on differences between objectives and assessments. I have made some revisions to my Mod 8 post:
DeleteFor Objective 3: I would design multiple-choice questions to assess 5 new words, and a paraphrase exercise to assess another 5 new words. The assessment can be done in class or back home.
For Objective 4: I would select 5 conversations from the game. For each conversation, I would provide two options for responding to one utterance in it. Students choose the better response and explain in one or two sentences why they make the choice. It is a class assignment that students should finish after class.